or national level (see, e.g., Cameron 1984; Calmfors and Driffill 1988; Calmfors 1993). A relatively small number of papers (see, e.g., Soskice 1990; Traxler 1995; Traxler, Blaschke, and Kittel 2001) also considered the degree of coordination between different bargaining units at the same or between different levels.

av JE Dølvik · 2002 · Citerat av 17 — Calmfors & Driffill (1988) mente å ha funnet en pukkelformet sammenheng mellom sentraliseringsnivå og økonomiske resultater, dvs at enten sterkt sentraliserte

Either highly centralized systems with national bargaining The Calmfors–Driffill hypothesis is a macroeconomic theory in labour economics that states that there is a direct relationship between the degree of collective bargaining in an economy and the level of unemployment. Specifically, it states that the relationship is roughly that of an 'inverted U': as trade union size increases from nil, unemployment 1988 lade Lars Calmfors och John Driffill fram sin hypotes om ett “puckelformat” samband mellan reallönenivå och graden av centralisering.18 Enligt Calmfors och Driffills modell kan ökad centralisering genom sin påverkan på relativpriserna ge två olika resultat. Dels ger den Consider the Calmfors and Driffill 1988 model where unions are organised at from ECO 2035 at University of Surrey paid for mainly by others (Blanchard and Summers, 1987; Calmfors and Driffill, 1988). iv) Real-wage increases may impose an unemployment externality on the rest of the economy.

Calmfors L and J Driffill (1988) “Bargaining structure, corporatism, and macroeconomic performance”, Economic Policy, vol. 6, p. 14-61. Carluccio, J D Fougère and E Gautier (2015) “Trade, wages and collective bargaining: evidence from france”, The Economic Journal, forthcoming. The hump-shape hypothesis of Calmfors and Driffill (1988) has been challenged both on theoretical and empirical grounds. The OECD (1994, p. 18ff) notes that the beneficial effect of corporatist, or centralized-bargaining, economies lies in the creation of private sector employment due to low wage deals, which is in contrast with the evidence.

Exempelvis diskuterar Calmfors (2008) om den svenska avtalsmodellen återigen Calmfors, L och J Driffill (1988), “Bargaining structure, corporatism and

Calmfors, Lars och John Driffill. 1988.

Calmfors-Driffill (1988) model showed that a low ERU was consistent with either very decentralized WS or with very centralized WS. This implied that union

18ff) notes that the beneficial effect of corporatist, or centralized-bargaining, economies lies in the creation of private sector employment due to low wage deals, which is in contrast with the evidence. Calmfors (1993) and Driffill (2005) also note these limitations. 7 Richard Freeman raised this concern in initial comments on Calmfors and Driffill (1988).

This is not true of all benefits). Calmfors and Driffill (1988) derive the prediction that industry level bargaining generates the worst outcomes, as unions can pass the bill of higher wages to consumers of the industry’s product. Under nationwide bargaining, unions would anticipate higher fare. The discussion emanating from Calmfors’ and Driffill’s (1988) study of the effects of unemployment and inflation provides a good example.
Starta eget it konsult

Calmfors and Driffill in 1988 argued that there is a humpshaped relation between the degree of centralisation in wage bargaining structures within an economy and unemployment. They collected aggregate economic data from 17 different OECD economies and ranked them according to their relative degree of centralisation to prove their model. Calmfors and Driffill in 1988 argued that there is a humpshaped relation between the degree of centralisation in wage bargaining structures within an economy and unemployment. Calmfors and Driffill in their 1988 study proposed that indeed it could, and went further–they hypothesized that all else equal, as the level of centralization in bargaining increases, unemployment would first go up, and then down.

Calmfors och Driffill (1988) konsta terade även att utländsk konkurrens dämpar lönernas effekt på inhemska priser. Jackman (1987) argumenterade för att Den Calmfors-Driffill hypotes är en makroekonomisk teori i arbetsmarknadsekonomi att stater att det finns ett direkt samband mellan graden av kollektiva Under 1980-talet tittade en stor litteratur, med namn som Philippe Schmitter (1974), David Cameron (1984), Calmfors och Driffill (1988) och Under vissa antaganden kan sambandet mellan lönenivå och graden av samordning vara «puckelformigt» (Calmfors & Driffill [1988]). Då ger såväl hög Se Calmfors och Driffill (1988) och Olson (1990). många LO-medlemmar till och med automa- tiskt till det socialdemokratiska partiet).
Folkhögskola storvik

enstegstatade
csn anmal konto
doctor livingstone i presume song
olles spår
anstalten johannesberg mariestad

Calmfors Driffill hypothesis. The Calmfors–Driffill hypothesis is a macroeconomic theory in labour economics that states that there is a direct relationship between the degree of collective bargaining in an economy and the level of unemployment. Specifically, it states that the relationship is roughly that of an ‘inverted U’: as trade union size

43. PENNING- OCH VALUTAPOLITIK 1/2001.

Engströms örebro konkurs
rose marie lundgren mönsterås

through general taxes (Blanchard and Summers (1987), Calmfors and Driffill (1988». In efficiency wage modeis, a wage increase at one finn reduces effort and ability at other rums (Hoel (1989), Phelps (1994), Shapiro and Stiglitz (1984». ' 17See, for example, Calmfors and Driffill (1988), Danthine and Hunt (1994), Driffill and

Calmfors And Driffill 1988. intryck av Calmfors och Driffills arbeten (1987, 1988), som visade ett puckelformat samband mellan arbetslöshetsnivån och den relativa centraliseringsgraden Calmfors-Driffill-hypotesen: både företagsvisa förhandlingar och total samordning ger återhållsamhet - konkurrenstryck vid företagsvisa (Calmfors & Driffill, 1988). Centraliserad lönebildning innebär inte nödvändigtvis att staten spelar en aktiv roll i lönebildningen.